Reading on the grid and the Pulitzer snub
17 Apr
Whenever I walk into a bookstore, certain novels mock me for not having read them. Tender is the Night. Rabbit Is Rich. Lolita. Anna Fucking Karina. I can practically hear the spines screeching from the shelves: “Hey, English major! Former English literature teacher! So-called lover of stories and language! How have you been on this planet for 30 years and not found the time to read us?
Maybe, like the Pulitzer people, I’ve let fiction down. (Sorry, low dig, but I’ll get to that.)
Digression: in a culture fueled by celebrity, the literary world isn’t immune to the virus of building up and then tearing down its own superstars. So it’s no wonder that a book like Chad Harbach’s The Art of Fielding would emerge as an instant classic – or that B.R. Myers would take issue with the hit novel. In this month’s Atlantic magazine, Myers argues that Fielding is mediocre at best, and that it became last year’s must-read because the public needed an “it” book to knit them closer together. Is he right? Do readers need a popularity grid so everyone can feel they’re on the same literati playing field? #nopunintended.


